The browser you are using is not supported by this website. All versions of Internet Explorer are no longer supported, either by us or Microsoft (read more here: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/windows/end-of-ie-support).

Please use a modern browser to fully experience our website, such as the newest versions of Edge, Chrome, Firefox or Safari etc.

Tullia Jack.

Tullia Jack

Associate senior lecturer, associate professor

Tullia Jack.

How individuals make sense of their climate impacts in the capitalocene : mixed methods insights from calculating carbon footprints

Author

  • Tullia Jack
  • Jonas Bååth
  • Jukka Taneli Heinonen
  • Kirsten Gram-Hanssen

Summary, in English

Many people want to play their part to tackle climate change, but often do not know where to start. Carbon Footprint (CF) Calculators pose potential for helping individuals situate themselves in climate impacting systems of which they are a part. However, little is currently known about whether and how individuals who complete CF calculators understand their CF in the context of climate change. This article explores how people make sense of their CFs and locate themselves in the capitalocene. It draws on theories of social practices, environmental ethics, valuation, and knowledge-use to analyse data from 500+ Danes who completed a CF calculator (https://carbonfootprint.hi.is) and interviews with 30 Danes who were asked to complete the CF calculator. In this article, we describe how Danes’ CFs are impacted, looking at how survey respondents rate importance of mitigating climate change, importance of personal actions, and importance of public steering, as well as disposable income, living space, and family type. We also show how interviewees reflect over their consumption activities and possibilities. Those with high income nearly always had high CF but felt like they had little agency to change the system and rather justified their high-emitting practices such as flying, while those with low CF felt they had more agency in the system. The results show that high-CF individuals resist voluntary reduction of their emissions despite the presence of environmental ethics. Thus, we conclude that systemic solutions have the foremost capacity to reduce carbon emissions.

Department/s

  • Department of Service Studies
  • Sociology
  • CIRCLE

Publishing year

2024

Language

English

Pages

777-791

Publication/Series

Sustainability Science

Volume

19

Issue

3

Document type

Journal article

Publisher

Springer

Topic

  • Social Sciences Interdisciplinary

Keywords

  • Capitalocene
  • Carbon footprint calculators
  • Climate concern
  • Environmental ethics
  • Individual agency
  • Valuation

Status

Published

ISBN/ISSN/Other

  • ISSN: 1862-4065