The browser you are using is not supported by this website. All versions of Internet Explorer are no longer supported, either by us or Microsoft (read more here: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/windows/end-of-ie-support).

Please use a modern browser to fully experience our website, such as the newest versions of Edge, Chrome, Firefox or Safari etc.

How is leadership enacted? New thesis examines leadership in everyday situations

A woman talking to another woman in a hospital environment.
Photo: Centre for Ageing Better, Unsplash.com.

What constitutes leadership? The idea of leadership is often that of a strong individual offering positive solutions and heroic deeds. But this is difficult to demonstrate in everyday interactions without falling into arguments that could be criticised, given that leadership is practised all the time and everywhere. In his thesis “How is leadership enacted?: Sacralization in everyday interactions at a care and elderly care administration”, Marcus Persson examines how the practice of leadership can be made explicit in everyday life.

Previous leadership research has often been based on quantitative methods, focusing on individuals, which does not reveal the everyday interactions between them. In his thesis, Marcus Persson has instead employed qualitative methods. Through 278 hours of ethnographic fieldwork over 8 months, he has been based at a health and social care administration where he has observed those working there, attended meetings and spoken with staff to capture and understand these everyday encounters.

"In my thesis, I explore how it is analytically possible to approach the atmosphere, or ‘energy’, that most people have surely experienced in certain situations: when, together with others, we are filled with a desire to take action and cannot contain our enthusiasm. “Something I have explored in my thesis is how, in certain situations, individuals together become more inclined to show that they want to do something. I call it collective elation, a mood created within a group of individuals. There are different types of rhythms in different situations. An energy is created that makes people focused and engaged,” says Persson.

To explain this, Persson uses the concept of sacralisation. Sacralisation is defined as a situation-based extraordinaryisation whereby individuals begin to finish each other’s sentences, laugh together, speak more quickly, gesticulate, make exclamations and thereby create symbolic meaning in the present moment. Sometimes this occurs simultaneously with ‘direction-setting’, a central concept in leadership research, which means that individuals talk about what they have done and are going to do, something that opens the way for action.

Sacralisation, in combination with the creation of direction, therefore means that what individuals talk about—that is, actions that have been performed, are being performed, or are to be performed—become symbols that are elevated and represent something more. The thesis uses, as an example, the work on a toilet seat designed to measure faeces. In that moment, it symbolises how employees are involved in the work of innovation and how this challenge posed by the ageing population can be solved.

"Sacralisation is about individuals finding a rhythm together; they fill in each other’s statements, focus on the same thing and create collective elation. What happens then is that what they are talking about in the moment means more than it actually does, even if the subject might not otherwise have generated excitement. It becomes a particularly important direction for their work."

Practical application of the findings

"For practitioners, the findings provide an opportunity to reflect on their own thoughts about leadership and how difficult it is in interactions. Although my argument is that leadership is fundamentally exercised through everyday actions, it is at the same time difficult, and it is not possible to formulate a simple formula for how individuals in organisations create positive solutions. My conclusions point to the need for reciprocity, for showing consideration and understanding that we need to help one another in a complex world", concludes Persson.

Abstract

Leadership has been described as a disappearing phenomenon – a (positive) solution that can be attached to almost any problem, yet it is difficult to capture as it happens. Charisma, transformation, and extra-ordinarization are perspectives on leadership where certain individuals are ascribed extraordinary qualities, but this is not captured analytically in everyday interactions. However, Leadership-as-Practice and leadership in interaction together constitute an emerging approach, where scholars are explicitly interested in studying how leadership is enacted in situ. Working with observations and recordings, several studies have so far explored how leadership is enacted in continuous negotiation between individuals and their context. However, the argument that leadership is constantly emerging means that the understanding of how the phenomenon is enacted is susceptible to criticism that it happens all the time, everywhere. It is unclear when what is enacted, in everyday interactions, is not leadership and it is difficult to understand how it could be related to a more general faith in leadership, being about extraordinary qualities or a positive solution to problems. In this dissertation, I draw on an ethnographic fieldwork from a care and elderly care administration, in one Swedish municipality, to contribute with knowledge about why certain everyday interactions in formal organizations can be understood as leadership. Starting with the concept “accomplishment of direction”, I first discover how rhythm is performed between individuals. Then, by using interaction ritual chains as my theoretical framework, I explore how individuals together enact sacralization: a situated extra-ordinarization where actions connected to the accomplishment of direction is actively ascribed symbolic meaning. In the present, what individuals are doing represent something more than the everyday. Hence, enacting leadership could be understood as the accomplishment of direction and sacralization, where the latter is captured in everyday interactions when silences disappear, because individuals are filling in each other’s utterances, laughing together, making exclamations, and gesturing. Certain interactions in the care and elderly care administration, where individuals are talking about for instance measuring feces, could therefore be examples of how leadership is enacted, while others are not – and in this dissertation I contribute to an understanding about why. Enacting leadership is both mundane and extraordinary.

Link to the thesis in the Lund University research portal (thesis is in Swedish).